|
|
relying on the RICE score can have certain disadvantages: Time-consuming: RICE can be challenging to use for complex roadmaps Conducting surveys and research to understand Reach, tracking user satisfaction, revenue, and other metrics to understand impact, etc, can all take quite a lot of time May be subjective: How RICE is implemented often depends on the PM in charge While some PMs may prioritize the Reach of the product, others may prioritize the Impact Although the overall RICE score addresses these biases, there is always room for subjective interpretation May be prone to errors.
RICE-derived insights may be faulty if data is not accurate There are several things you can do to make sure that the RICE prioritization framework is thriving Let's explore them now Best practices to use RICE effectively As a product manager, you might wo Argentina WhatsApp Number nder how to use the RICE framework effectively Here are some best practices: Identify the items on the roadmap Although this needn't be stated, many PMs take items on roadmaps for granted and haphazardly make a list Facts, opinions, and decisions should always be made based on insights derived from customer surveys, user feedback, technical inputs, and other sources .
Derive hypotheses Before implementing RICE, it's best to derive one or more assumptions that clearly state the problems at hand and what needs to be achieved at the end of the roadmap Identify data sources and methods Much like any research project, data sources to assign RICE scores This ensures that there is no room for bias or prejudices Examples include surveys, feedback forms, experiments, user behavior analytics, etc These can help you estimate reach, impact, confidence, and effort Quantify RICE based on agreed-upon scores Make sure that scoring
|
|
發表於 2024-3-4 14:54:49